Ivy League Graduate · Attorney (India) · Columbia Law School LL.M., 2025 Licensed by New York State Supreme Court as Legal Consultant (India)
When courts question an accused person, how are the right to silence and the presumption of innocence protected? Parth Singh and Vaibhav Yadav examine this tension in their article on Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

From Silence to Justice: A Critical Analysis of Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and the Right to Remain Silent in India
Parth Singh; Vaibhav Yadav · International Annals of Criminology 62(3–4), pp. 543–569 · Cambridge University Press · DOI 10.1017/cri.2024.18.
Issue: September 2024 · Online: 30 June 2025.
Abstract-based overview: The article examines how questioning under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 interacts with the right to silence and the presumption of innocence. The abstract argues that an opportunity to explain the prosecution’s case has come to operate as an expectation of explanation. It connects that development with the protection against self-incrimination in Article 20(3). The authors examine the tension between a court’s opportunity to hear an accused person’s response and the pressures that questioning may place on silence. Their research concerns the historical statute named in the article.
From silence to justice — publisher record
Selected bibliography · Research topics · Sentencing in India
Illustration: original editorial artwork prepared for Parth Singh.
Parth Singh · Indian advocate · Columbia Law School LL.M., 2025.
© 2026 Parth Singh. Photograph credits and editorial policy · Privacy and accessibility. Third-party works retain their stated licences.
Optional cookie tracking supports GoDaddy visitor metrics and platform integrations. Accept enables this tracking; Decline closes this notice without enabling it. Read Privacy & Accessibility for information about enquiries, third-party services and accessibility. You can also manage cookies in your browser.